[okl4-developer] Hello world on arm926ejs....

[Peter Howard]

On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 14:39 +1100, Peter Howard wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 00:55 +0100, Hugues Balp wrote:
> > Thanks for your prompt reply...
> > 
> > Yes you are true, I used an older version of the crosstool chain.
> > In fact I had some problems the first time I tried to compile crosstool 
> > with gcc-4.2.4-glibc-2.7
> > and specially with the binutils-2.18, so I tried then an older version ( 
> > gcc-3.4.5-glibc-2.3.6 )
> > that was marked ok for the script "arm-softfloat" in the buildlogs of 
> > the crosstool web site.
> > at the URL http://kegel.com/crosstool/current/buildlogs.
> > 
> > At present I have understood what happened by looking at the compilation 
> > logs...
> > Some tests on the availability of the makeinfo tool where true, some 
> > other false...
> > So I have commented the bugged test in the file 
> > crosstool-0.43/binutils-2.18/missing
> > 
> > Another thing was that I didn't have the gawk tool on my host.
> > 
> > Now I have just succeded in recompiling from scratch the crosstool-0.43 
> > with gcc-4.2.4-glibc-2.7
> > with the patch "crosstool-eabi-0.43.patch" provided in the OKL4 wiki.
> > My new version of the crosstool chain is configured as shown in the 
> > joined file.
> > 
> > Nevertheless the same error occur when I retry to compile the hello worl 
> > example
> > with this new crosstool chain and the precompiled SDK...
> > 
> 
> I think we should persevere with the SDK options for reasons that will
> hopefully be clear from my comments further below.  With the newly-built
> crosstool, can you try building from a clean sdk tree (i.e. remove the
> untarred version and untar it again)?


PS - there's now a binary tarball of the crosstool build on the wiki
page.  You can try that too.

-- 
Peter Howard <peterh at ok-labs.com>