[okl4-developer] Starting OKL4 development... success

[Subcommander l0r3zz]

Sorry for being premature.
I've solved my build problems on my own ;)
I do still have the question of whether it is "safe" to use Python 2.51 as
I'm doing,
the build seems to have completed without incident.

I'm not very familiar with the SCons way of building software, could someone
point me to a "howto" that talks about how OK-Labs nicta has utilized it?
My immediate question is how do I perform the equivalent of a "make clean" ?



On Jan 13, 2008 12:07 PM, Subcommander l0r3zz <l0r3zz at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Jan 13, 2008 2:25 AM, Subcommander l0r3zz <l0r3zz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Compiling under OpenSuSE 10.3 with the downloaded toolchain suggested
> > for ia32_pc99.
> > Problems with the build environment wanting distcc.
> > Is there a more comprehensive "how to" for a nube to get their build
> > environment up then just the README ?
> >
> > Checked the archives and couldn't find anything.
> >
> > Will start on qemu and then switch to VMware (with VT enabled ;)
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> I found this in the archives...
>
> The better guide is here
> >
> > http://portal.ok-labs.com/_assets/downloads/README.quickstart.txt
> >
> > I think build_system.rst is very old and it doesn't apply to OKL4.
> >
>
> Must the Python version ABSOLUTELY be 2.4? I have 2.51 installed under
> OpenSuSE 10.3 and I fudged the sym link.
> Could this cause problems? (Actually my immediate problem is how to get it
> to NOT use distcc ;)
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.okl4.org/pipermail/developer/attachments/20080113/e01ac59a/attachment.htm